Paul Feyerabend

Paul Feyerabend was a philosopher of science known for his work in the philosophy of science and his critique of scientific rationalism. He is best known for his book 'Against Method' where he argued against the idea that science follows a universal and fixed method.

This list of books are ONLY the books that have been ranked on the lists that are aggregated on this site. This is not a comprehensive list of all books by this author.

  1. 1. Against Method

    Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge

    "Against Method" argues that science does not adhere to a strict, universal method and that the idea of a singular scientific method is a myth. The author challenges the notion that science progresses through a consistent, rule-based approach, suggesting instead that scientific breakthroughs often require creativity, non-conformity, and the breaking of rules. The book posits that the advancement of knowledge depends on anarchistic strategies that subvert rigid scientific norms, advocating for a more pluralistic, tolerant, and individualistic approach to scientific research. This perspective encourages a methodological pluralism where multiple methodologies coexist, allowing for a more diverse and dynamic scientific inquiry.

    The 17010th Greatest Book of All Time
    Purchase from Bookshop.org or Amazon
  2. 2. Killing Time

    The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend

    A candid, often irreverent autobiography that traces a journey from war-scarred youth and a debilitating injury to a globe-trotting academic life at the center of fierce debates in the philosophy of science. Mixing anecdotes, portraits of colleagues, and self-critique, it recounts love affairs, artistic passions, and controversies while charting the evolution of a radical pluralism that challenged scientific dogma.

  3. 3. The Tyranny Of Science

    A trenchant critique of the elevation of scientific methods and institutions to unquestioned authority, arguing that rigid methodological rules and the cultural dominance of 'science' amount to a form of intellectual and political domination; it defends epistemological pluralism, shows how creativity and progress often arise from irregular, historically contingent practices, and calls for greater public scrutiny, tolerance of alternative traditions, and a more democratic, less dogmatic approach to knowledge and policy.

    Purchase from Bookshop.org